Conflict Zones
The Viral Bridge Story: What Steve Sweeney Didn’t Tell You
A viral post claimed Israel tried to assassinate a journalist. The record shows warnings, Hezbollah territory, and the journalist’s own tweets tell a very different story.
Tim Flack
Mar 24, 2026 - 4:15 PM
Mar 24, 2026 - 4:15 PM
Share
There is a certain kind of story that arrives fully formed. It comes with a villain, a victim, a dramatic video, and a moral lesson pre-attached. It asks nothing of you except that you share it.
On 19 March 2026, just such a story appeared on X, posted by a British journalist called Steve Sweeney. In it, he claimed that Israel had tried to kill him in a "targeted airstrike" while he reported from a bridge in southern Lebanon. He said there had been "no warnings ahead of the strike" and "no notifications sent to the Lebanese Army." He described the military operation around him as "ethnic cleansing on a larger scale than the Nakba." He accused Israel of trying to "silence journalists who document and report their war crimes."
The post went viral. It was shared tens of thousands of times. The Russian Foreign Ministry declared the strike "cannot be considered accidental." Political commentators queued up to express their horror. The Committee to Protect Journalists called for an investigation.
There was only one problem. Almost nothing Sweeney claimed was true.
The Bridge
Let us begin with where Sweeney chose to stand. The Qasmiya Bridge spans the Litani River at coordinates 33.333427°N, 35.255121°E, in the western sector of southern Lebanon. It connects the Zahrani and Sidon areas to the entire southern zone, including the city of Tyre. It is not a quaint footbridge over a stream. It is one of the most strategically significant river crossings in the region, and it has been a military target in every major conflict involving southern Lebanon for the better part of a century. British commandos attempted to seize it in 1941. The Israeli Air Force struck it during the 2006 war. It was rebuilt. In March 2026, it was struck again.
The IDF’s statement on the bridge was not ambiguous. It described the Qasmiya crossing as having been used by Hezbollah "for both terrorist movement and to transfer thousands of weapons, including rockets and rocket launchers intended to be used against IDF troops and Israeli civilians."
One might question such claims, were it not for the photographs. In the background of the footage shot by Sweeney’s own cameraman, clearly visible just metres from the bridge, stands a Hezbollah martyrs billboard. The faces of dead fighters. Yellow branding. Arabic text. These billboards are not put up by the local tourism board. They are erected by Hezbollah, in areas under Hezbollah’s operational control, to commemorate Hezbollah’s dead. Their presence at the crossing rather confirms what the IDF stated: this was Hezbollah territory, used for Hezbollah purposes.
The Warnings
These were not whispered into a filing cabinet. Sky News Arabia shared the warning on Facebook with the headline: "Avichay Adraee warns residents of southern Lebanon: head north of the Litani immediately." Future TV Lebanon posted: "Urgent Israeli warning to residents of southern Lebanon." Al Jazeera ran video coverage. The Lebanese Forces website published: "Israeli warning: We will target Litani crossings starting today." The warnings were everywhere, in Arabic, on every major platform, for a full day before Sweeney was hurt.
The Qasmiya Bridge was struck on the afternoon of 18 March. Sweeney went to it the following morning. He stood on a bridge that was visibly damaged from the previous day’s strike, in an area that had been publicly declared an active military target, surrounded by Hezbollah propaganda. He was then surprised to discover that it was struck again.
His Own Timeline
If the above were all we had, it would be sufficient to cast serious doubt on Sweeney’s account. But there is more. And it comes from the most inconvenient source imaginable: Sweeney himself.
Read that again. On his own public timeline, the day before he was injured, Sweeney personally shared the news that Israel was bombing Litani bridges. He then went to one of those bridges the next morning. And after being hit by shrapnel, he told the world there had been "no warnings."
His own timeline is the warning he claims never existed.
Sweeney also acknowledged in his viral tweet that the Lebanese Army "allowed us to film." He was coordinating with the LAF. The IDF communicates strike warnings to the Lebanese Armed Forces. So even if we were to indulge the fantasy that Sweeney had somehow missed Adraee’s posts, the Facebook coverage, the television broadcasts, and his own tweet, the military personnel he was in direct contact with would have known.
The Correspondent
It is worth pausing to consider the source. Steve Sweeney is the head of RT’s Lebanon bureau. RT, formerly Russia Today, is a Kremlin-funded state media outlet whose UK broadcasting licence was revoked by Ofcom in March 2022. The regulator concluded it was not "fit and proper" to broadcast. RT has been banned across the European Union. Multiple governments classify it as a propaganda instrument of the Russian state. Ofcom found it had broadcast "materially misleading" content on numerous occasions.
Before joining RT, Sweeney served as international editor for the Morning Star, the daily newspaper of the Communist Party of Britain. He has contributed to Al Mayadeen, classified by Israel’s security cabinet as Hezbollah-affiliated media.
In July 2025, Sweeney was detained at Heathrow Airport by UK Counter Terrorism police upon arriving from Beirut. His devices were seized. He was fingerprinted and had DNA samples taken. Officers questioned him about links to Russian officials and about his continued loyalty to the United Kingdom. He subsequently described himself as effectively exiled from Britain.
This, then, is the man now claiming that Israel deliberately tried to assassinate him. A correspondent for banned Russian state media, a contributor to Hezbollah-aligned outlets, a man flagged by UK counter-terrorism police, who shared news of the bridge strikes on his own timeline the day before he went to stand on one of them.For those of us in the know, and now those reading it is a fact that If Israel wanted to hit a specific person on that bridge, they had weapons accurate enough to do it. A SPICE 250 or GBU-39 could have put the munition within 1-3 metres of him. The fact that he survived, that the strike hit the bridge infrastructure rather than his filming position, is entirely consistent with the IDF's account: they were targeting the bridge, not the journalist. If they had wanted to kill him, with this level of precision, they would have.
The Amplification
What happened next was predictable. Within hours, the Russian Foreign Ministry declared the strike "cannot be considered accidental" and demanded responses from international organisations. The machinery of information warfare engaged. An incident at a declared military target, involving a journalist who had chosen to position himself in an active strike zone despite public warnings, was repackaged as evidence of deliberate press persecution.
Sweeney’s tweet followed the same template precisely. The language of genocide, ethnic cleansing, deliberate targeting, silencing of the press. None of this emerged from a careful assessment of what had occurred at the bridge. It was the editorial line before any missile landed. The strike merely provided a dramatic visual to attach it to.
The journalist Ryan Grim then amplified the claim, sharing Sweeney’s assertion that "it’s false to say he was warned ahead of time." One wonders whether Grim checked Sweeney’s own timeline before doing so.
What the Record Shows
Let us be precise. Sweeney claimed Israel tried to kill him in a targeted airstrike. The IDF struck a bridge it had publicly declared a military target twenty-four hours earlier, a bridge it had already hit the previous day, in a zone subject to broadcast evacuation orders with a combined view count in the hundreds of thousands.
Sweeney claimed there were no warnings. Four separate warnings were posted by the IDF spokesperson on 18 and 19 March, shared by Sky News Arabia, Al Jazeera, Future TV Lebanon, and the Lebanese Forces website. Sweeney himself shared news of the bridge strikes on his own X account the day before.
Sweeney claimed no notifications were sent to the Lebanese Army. His own tweet confirms he was coordinating with the LAF, who "allowed" him to film at the bridge.
Sweeney claimed this was about silencing journalists. The evidence shows it was about destroying a bridge used by Hezbollah to move thousands of weapons.
None of this is to say that a journalist deserves to be injured. Sweeney and his cameraman Ali Rida sustained shrapnel wounds and are receiving hospital treatment. One can wish them a full recovery while also observing that their account of events does not survive contact with the documentary record.
The warnings were public. The bridge was already damaged. The strike zone was declared. The Arabic-language media trail is documented, timestamped, and verifiable. And Sweeney’s own timeline places the lie to his central claim.
Steve Sweeney is a professional journalist who has worked in conflict zones for years. He operates in a region where monitoring military communications from all sides is not merely best practice; it is how you stay alive. He was coordinating with the Lebanese Army. He was at a bridge that had been bombed the day before. He had shared the news of the bridge strikes on his own social media account.
He knew. And now, so do you.
Share
Tim Flack
South African Public Relations Strategist | Investigative Commentator
Visegrad24 is funded by you, our readers—people who believe in truth, Western values, and combating disinformation.
The Viral Bridge Story: What Steve Sweeney Didn’t Tell You | Visegrad24
