David Brog, Executive Director of Maccabee Task Force (MTF) and author of “In Defense of Israel”, speaks candidly about the complexities surrounding the Israel-Palestine conflict and offers a perspective that challenges prevailing narratives, that often dominate discussions about Israel.
The Zionist Vision
Brog begins by addressing a key misconception: the notion that Zionist leaders from the start had a plan to expel Arabs in order to create a purely Jewish state. He firmly rejects this claim, noting that the early Zionist leaders were committed to building a state based on democratic principles and justice, even when faced with complex demographic realities.
"From the beginning of the war, the officers of the Israeli army had no rights to expel Arabs. It was only later in the war, as Arab armies invaded and a dire strategic situation unfolded, that Ben-Gurion gave his commanders the option of holding certain villages if the Arab residents had taken up arms against Israel," Brog explains. "But this was not about ethnic cleansing or creating an ethnically pure state - it was about survival and holding strategic territory."
Brog underscores the critical decisions made by Israel’s leaders during the war of independence: they chose morality over expediency. He emphasizes that the Zionist leadership made a conscious decision to leave intact many Arab communities within Israel's borders, even if it meant risking potential future tensions."
The founding leaders knew that their state would be multi-racial, with significant numbers of citizens who would not be thrilled about living in a Jewish state, but they were committed to justice," he notes.
A Multicultural, Multi-Racial State
Brog argues that Israel’s approach to its Arab citizens, including those who remained after the 1948 war, demonstrates the country’s commitment to democracy and coexistence. He points out that the Arab population in Israel today is far larger than it was before the founding of the state, with thriving communities that have grown under Israel’s sovereignty.
"Despite all the challenges, the Arab population in Israel has flourished," Brog asserts. "This is in stark contrast to the portrayal of Israel as a colonialist oppressor. In fact, Israel has been a refuge for Arabs who chose not to leave in 1948 and has allowed many communities to thrive, even when the broader region was embroiled in conflict."
Genocide?
Brog also delves into the sensitive issue of accusations of genocide, which have surfaced in recent years, particularly following escalations in Gaza. While he acknowledges the shocking images and incidents that have occurred during conflicts, he cautions against jumping to conclusions.
"Have war crimes been committed? Perhaps," Brog concedes. "But let's be clear about what genocide means. Genocide is the intentional extermination of a people, not the tragic consequences of warfare. Israel could have easily carried out a genocidal campaign against Palestinians, but it didn’t. Instead, Israel’s efforts to minimize civilian casualties in Gaza have set a new standard for urban warfare."
Brog points to the high level of precision and the efforts made to avoid harming civilians. "Israel’s army has been remarkably successful at minimizing civilian casualties. The combatant-to-civilian casualty ratio is one of the best in modern urban warfare, despite Hamas's deliberate strategy of hiding among civilians."
Social Media
Brog also examines the shift in public opinion, particularly among younger generations. He notes a marked divide in support for Israel between Boomers, who tend to be more supportive of Israel, and Gen Z, who often sympathize with Palestinians.
He believes that this shift is linked to the rise of social media platforms, where simplified and often misleading narratives about the conflict have taken root. "The Palestinian narrative fits perfectly into the 'woke' mindset that dominates social media," Brog explains. "The simplified dichotomy of oppressed people of color versus oppressors resonates with many, even though it's deeply misleading."
This shift, according to Brog, is fueled by a lack of understanding about the history of the region and the complexities of the Israel-Palestine conflict. "What people don’t realize is that most Israelis are actually people of color, descended from Jews who were expelled from the Muslim world and North Africa," he says. "And they don’t understand that Israel is the only place in the Middle East where Arabs can enjoy the most freedom, security, and opportunities."
Brog also highlights the efforts of the Maccabee Task Force to challenge the prevailing anti-Israel narrative by bringing students to Israel and the Palestinian Authority. "We take progressive students who are critical of Israel and let them experience the reality on the ground," he explains. "The results are overwhelmingly positive - once they see the situation for themselves, they often undergo a dramatic shift in their perspective."
The Role of Hamas in the Conflict
A critical component of Brog’s analysis is the role that Hamas plays in perpetuating the violence and instability. He argues that Hamas's strategy of drawing Israel into urban combat, where civilians are inevitably caught in the crossfire, is central to the tragedy of Gaza.
"Hamas's strategy is to provoke Israel into fighting in civilian areas, knowing that Israel will go to great lengths to avoid harming innocent lives," he says. "It’s a cynical strategy, and it’s working because they’ve been able to manipulate public opinion by presenting themselves as victims, even as they use civilians as human shields."
Brog condemns Hamas's tactics but stresses that it is important to place blame where it belongs. "Do we blame Israel for defending itself? Or do we blame Hamas for creating a situation where civilians are at risk? It's important to understand the dynamics of this conflict."
Could a Majority-Arab Israel Have Worked?
Finally, Brog contemplates the hypothetical scenario in which Israel had a majority Arab population. He acknowledges the complexities of this situation but argues that Israel could have worked with such a demographic, provided the Arab citizens were not hostile to the state.
"If the Arabs who stayed in 1948 had been willing to coexist peacefully with the Jewish state, Israel could have worked as a multicultural democracy," he says. "But that’s the key: it would have required both sides to be willing to live together in peace, and that was not the reality at the time."
Brog stresses that the Zionist movement was never about expelling Arabs or creating an ethnically pure state. "The idea that the Zionists planned to expel Arabs is a myth. From the beginning, the Zionists knew that the new state would need to accommodate a diverse population," he concludes.
Beyond the Myths
David Brog’s message is clear: Israel’s leaders prioritized morality, democracy, and coexistence from the very beginning. While acknowledging the challenges and the tragedies of war, Brog argues that Israel’s actions have been driven by a commitment to justice and self-defense, not genocide or ethnic cleansing.
Ultimately, Brog believes that in order to understand the truth about Israel, one must look beyond the biased narratives and engage with the facts. "The more people understand about Israel, the more they will see how false the anti-Israel narrative truly is," he says.
"Israel may be a small country, but its commitment to freedom, democracy, and human rights stands as a beacon in a region where those values are too often in short supply."
Alexandra Tompson
Editor | Lawyer (Admitted in New York; England & Wales)
